Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Review
- Phase 1: Pre-Licensing Assessment of Compliance with Regulatory Requirements
- Phase 2: Pre-Licensing Assessment for Any Potential Fundamental Barriers to Licensing
- Phase 3 Follow-up
- Status of Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Reviews
A Pre-Licensing Vendor Design Review is an optional service provided by the CNSC when requested by a vendor.
A pre-licensing vendor design review is an assessment of a nuclear power plant design based on a vendor's reactor technology. The assessment is completed by the CNSC, at the request of the vendor. The words “pre-licensing” signifies that a design review is undertaken prior to the submission of a licence application to the CNSC by an applicant seeking to build and operate a new nuclear power plant.
This review does not certify a reactor design or involve the issuance of a licence under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act, and it is not required as part of the licensing process for a new nuclear power plant. The conclusions of any design review do not bind or otherwise influence decisions made by the Commission.
The objective of a review is to verify, at a high level, the acceptability of a nuclear power plant design with respect to Canadian nuclear regulatory requirements and expectations, as well as Canadian codes and standards. These reviews also identify fundamental barriers to licensing a new design in Canada and assures that a resolution path exists for any design issues identified in the review.
A vendor who has completed a phase 2 pre-licensing vendor design review, has committed to increased regulatory efficiencies at the time of licensing. The results of Phase 2 will be taken into account mainly for the Construction Licence Application and is likely to result in increased efficiencies of technical reviews.
The reviews take place in three phases, each of which is conducted against related CNSC regulatory documents and Canadian codes & standards:
Phase 1: Pre-Licensing Assessment of Compliance with Regulatory Requirements: This phase involves an overall assessment of the vendor's nuclear power plant design against the most recent CNSC design requirements for new nuclear power plants in Canada as indicated in REGDOC-2.5.2, Design Of Reactor Facilities: Nuclear Power Plants or Design of Small Reactor Facilities (RD-367) as applicable, as well as all other related CNSC regulatory documents and Canadian codes & standards.
Phase 2: Pre-Licensing Assessment for Any Potential Fundamental Barriers to Licensing: This phase goes into further details with a focus on identifying any potential fundamental barriers to licensing the vendor's nuclear power plant design in Canada.
Phase 3 Follow-up: This phase allows the vendor to follow-up on certain aspects of Phase 2 findings by:
- seeking more information from the CNSC about a Phase 2 topic; and/or
- asking the CNSC to review activities taken by the vendor towards the reactor's design readiness, following the completion of Phase 2.
For more Information on the CNSC's Pre-licensing Vendor Design Review, please refer to GD-385, Pre-licensing Review of a Vendor's Reactor Design.
Status of Pre-licensing Vendor Design Reviews
Participating vendors and their review completion dates are outlined below. Please note that planned completion dates for current reviews may be adjusted as needed by mutual agreement.
Current pre-licensing vendor design reviews
The following table presents an overview of vendors who have applied for pre-licensing engagement with the CNSC using the vendor design review process for their new reactor designs. Vendor design review is described in guidance document GD-385, Pre-licensing Review of a Vendor's Reactor Design. The duration of each review is estimated based on the vendor’s proposed schedule. A Phase 1 review typically takes 12–18 months and a Phase 2 review takes 24 months.
At the end of the review for each phase, an executive summary of the project report will be posted on this Web page.
|Vendor||Name of design and cooling type||Approximate electrical capacity (MW electrical)||Applied for||Review start date||Status|
|Terrestrial Energy Inc.||IMSR
Integral Molten Salt Reactor
|200||Phase 1||April 2016||Phase 1 complete|
|Phase 2||Pending summer
|Service Agreement signed and in force|
|NuScale Power, LLC||NuScale
Pressurized Water Reactor
|50||Phase 2*||Pending mid-2018||Service agreement under development|
|Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation / Global First Power||MMR-5 and MMR-10 High Temperature Gas||5-10||Phase 1||December 2016||Assessment in progress|
|Phase 2||Pending summer
|Service agreement under amendment|
|Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC||eVinci Micro Reactor Solid core and heat pipes||Various outputs up to 25 MWe||Phase 2*||To be determined||Service agreement under development|
|LeadCold Nuclear Inc.||SEALER
|3||Phase 1||January 2017||Phase 1 on hold at vendor's request|
|Advanced Reactor Concepts Ltd.||ARC-100
|100||Phase 1||Fall 2017||Assessment in progress|
|4||Phase 1||Tentative Spring 2018||Service agreement under development|
|Moltex Energy||Moltex Energy Stable Salt Reactor
|300||Series Phase 1 and 2||December 2017||Phase 1 assessment in progress|
|SMR, LLC. (A Holtec International Company)||SMR-160 Pressurized Light Water||160||Phase 1||To be determined||Service agreement under development|
|StarCore Nuclear||StarCore Module
|10||Series Phase 1 and 2||To be determined||Service agreement under development|
*Phase 1 objectives will be addressed within the Phase 2 scope of work.
For questions about vendor design review, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Completed vendor pre-licensing vendor design reviews
Note: Due to the commercially sensitive and proprietary information in the full report, the CNSC is only able to post the Executive Summaries.
Terrestrial Energy Inc. – IMSR 400:
- Phase 1 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of Terrestrial Energy’s 400-thermal-megawatt integral molten salt reactor (IMSR400) (PDF, November 2017)
AECL – ACR-1000:
- Phase 1 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL's Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR-1000) (PDF, December 2008)
- Phase 2 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL's Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR-1000) (PDF, August 2009)
- Phase 3 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL's Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR-1000) (PDF, December 2010)
ATMEA – ATMEA1:
Candu Energy* – EC 6 (Enhanced CANDU):
* On October 2, 2011, SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. acquired certain assets of AECL's commercial operations. The business operates as a wholly owned subsidiary called Candu Energy Inc.
- Phase 1 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of AECL's Enhanced Candu – EC 6 (PDF, April 2010)
- Phase 2: Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of Candu Energy's Enhanced Candu – EC 6 (PDF, April 2012)
- Phase 3: Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of Candu Energy's EC6TM Reactor Design (PDF, June 2013)
Westinghouse – AP1000:
- Phase 1 Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of Westinghouse's Advanced Passive Plant Design (AP1000TM) (PDF, January 2010)
- Phase 2: Executive Summary: Pre-Project Review of Westinghouse's Advanced Passive Plan Design (AP1000TM) (PDF, June 2013)
Cancelled pre-licensing vendor design reviews
AREVA – EPR:
- Phase 1 Review terminated effective December 27, 2012
Need more information?
If you require further information, contact the CNSC.
- Date modified: